DEMO · fictional vessel list · 2026-09-22T10:00:00Z
1vessels
0sanctions IMO matches
1sanctions name candidates
0current PSC events
1PSC history
0limited / incomplete
Two different controls. Financial-sanctions designations and Port State Control (PSC/MOU) bannings or detention history are reported separately. A PSC record is a maritime safety/compliance review signal, not a sanctions designation. The submitted company is context only. Owners, operators or managers shown from an official vessel record are relationship evidence and were not independently screened or ownership/control-verified. A name-only no-hit is Limited, not Clear.
Applied name-candidate threshold: 75 / 100. Name candidates below this threshold were excluded; exact IMO matches were retained regardless of score. Historical PSC/MOU records were included; current events remain in scope. Source readiness recorded for 2 of 2 configured sanctions and maritime-risk sources. IMO matches are identity matches; name scores are candidate-ranking signals only and require analyst review.
#
Overall
Vessel
IMO
Submitted company
Source-related party
Sanctions
PSC / MOU
Evidence
1
CANDIDATE - REVIEW
DEMO NORTHERN VOYAGER
-
Demo Ocean Management Ltd
context only; not screened
-
NAME CANDIDATE
1 candidate(s)
DETENTION HISTORY
1 event(s)
No IMO number was supplied; name-only screening cannot produce a green result.
The associated company was retained as context and was not screened.
Synthetic sanctions example · Fictional demonstration
Matched as: DEMO NORTHERN VOYAGER · method: name candidate
Legal basis: Illustrative source record — not a real designation
This fictional candidate demonstrates how a reviewer sees source evidence. Name similarity is a review signal and does not establish identity. Secondary identifiers and the underlying official source must be reviewed before a decision.
Synthetic sanctions example · Fictional demonstration
Matched as: DEMO NORTHERN VOYAGER · method: name candidate
Legal basis: Illustrative source record — not a real designation
This fictional candidate demonstrates how a reviewer sees source evidence. Name similarity is a review signal and does not establish identity. Secondary identifiers and the underlying official source must be reviewed before a decision.