Customer control · audit evidence
Sanctions due diligence
Northbridge Demonstration Trading Ltd
Evidence referenceDEMO-CDD-2026-0001
Recorded eventScreened
Event time22 Sept 2026, 10:00:00 UTC
Recorded byAutomated control
Legal nameNorthbridge Demonstration Trading Ltd
Registration numberDEMO-REG-001
CountryLV
AddressNot recorded
Recorded rationale. Fictional name candidate awaiting identifier and source review.
Saved control snapshot
Screening versioncustomer-sanctions-v2
Threshold75
Official sources1
Review candidates1
Evidence schemacustomer-dd-evidence-v2
Rendered at22 Sept 2026, 10:00:00 UTC
This report is generated from the stored event; opening or printing it does not run screening again.
A clear result means no review candidate was returned under the recorded query, policy, threshold and source inventory. It is not a guarantee that the customer is unsanctioned or outside ownership/control restrictions.
The underlying screening engine may evaluate a wider low-confidence retrieval set; rows that do not meet the recorded customer-review policy are not presented as customer candidates.
Review candidates (1)
| Candidate | Matched name | Score / quality | Identifiers | List / source |
|---|---|---|---|---|
| Northbridge Demonstration Trading Ltd (fictional) ID 1 |
Northbridge Demonstration Trading | 92 recorded candidate |
Country LV | DEMO_SANCTIONS DEMO |
Change since previous screening
This is the first saved screening snapshot; there is no earlier run to compare.
Official source inventory (1)
| List | Authority | Jurisdiction | Snapshot freshness |
|---|---|---|---|
| Synthetic sanctions example DEMO_SANCTIONS | — | — | — |
Evidence history
- 22 Sept 2026, 10:00:00 UTCScreened · selectedHuman review required · Automated control · Fictional name candidate awaiting identifier and source review.
Scope and review note
This is a narrow customer sanctions-screening control. It does not replace corporate-register verification, beneficial-ownership analysis, an ownership/control assessment, export-control classification or legal advice.
Where a candidate or other red flag could involve an owned or controlled entity, the reviewer must verify relevant identifiers and document the ownership/control assessment against official or reliable corporate evidence before deciding.